
Grupa: Użytkownik
Posty: 549
#8395607
Od: 2024-9-4
|
Colleagues, question about early-stage work. We often need to explore massing and volume options before any design is finalised, mainly for internal review and investor conversations. Full photorealistic renders feel like overkill at that stage, both in cost and time. Is there a sensible middle ground or is it all or nothing with rendering studios? |

Grupa: Użytkownik
Posty: 272
#8395608
Od: 2024-9-4
|
Hello. Definitely a middle ground, and good studios welcome it because it's less speculative work for them too. Architectural modeling at massing stage produces clean volumetric studies without material and lighting treatment, which is faster and considerably cheaper. It's genuinely sufficient for internal review and most investor conversations at concept stage. The other advantage is that the model carries forward, so when design firms up you're not starting over. Just be explicit that you want massing-level output, otherwise studios default to assuming you want full treatment and quote accordingly. Agree the level of detail in writing.
|